|
A: Supportive processes
|
Review
|
Policy dialogue
|
|
Interactions between medical and non-medical universities have not been defined
|
*
| |
|
Organizational resources for information technology development are inadequate
|
*
| |
|
Academic members are selected regardless of the skills required
|
*
| |
|
Lack of mutual trust between researchers
|
*
| |
|
Researchers are dispersed, and there is no coordination among them
|
*
| |
|
There are no clearly defined task descriptions in knowledge translation (KT) units
| |
*
|
|
The superficiality of policies and processes of teamwork thinking and interdisciplinary research
| |
*
|
|
Researchers are not employed based on research needs
| |
*
|
|
B: Incentive systems
|
Review
|
Policy dialogue
|
|
B1: Organizational values and goals
|
|
Absence of a sustainable development approach in research
| |
*
|
|
B2: Individual capacities and capabilities
|
|
Researchers' lack of awareness on the necessity of KT
|
*
| |
|
Researchers' inadequate skills in research and KT methods
|
*
| |
|
Researchers' lack of familiarity with target audiences and the methodology of policy-making studies
|
*
| |
|
B3: Performance evaluation and reward programmes
|
|
Considering quantitative criteria such as publication instead of giving importance to research quality and its applicability
|
*
| |
|
Neglecting KT activities in the performance evaluation
|
*
| |
|
Researchers' inadequate incentives to produce applied knowledge and the lack of the need to transfer their results
|
*
| |
|
Researchers' preference to choose easy instead of difficult research
| |
*
|
|
Lack of incentives to interact with society
| |
*
|
|
C: Characteristics of evidence
|
Source
|
|
C1: Research evidence
|
Review
|
Policy dialogue
|
|
Weak strategic purchasing of research: research is not consistent with the users' needs and priorities
|
*
| |
|
Stakeholders do not participate in conducting the research
|
*
| |
|
Lack of trust of local evidence produced
|
*
| |
|
Absence of appropriate laws for protecting individuals' intellectual property rights
|
*
| |
|
The research results published are not up to date
|
*
| |
|
Local evidence is not used
|
*
| |
|
The persistence of journals' editor-in-chief councils on the publication of specific topics
|
*
| |
|
Poor quality of evidence
| |
*
|
|
High volume of data or conflicting results, design, and differing values
| |
*
|
|
Lengthy and conflicting review processes
| |
*
|
|
C2: Routine health system data (registration, collection, analysis, dissemination)
|
|
Those registering the routine data are unaware of the data's significance
|
*
| |
|
The lack of timely registration of patient data due to lack of coordination among different units and the unreliability of the data
|
*
| |
|
Incomplete implementation of health information systems
|
*
| |
|
Delay in or lack of decision-maker access to routine data, particularly data related to cost of services
|
*
| |
