|
Understanding of evidence and its purpose
|
1. From your perspective, what do you understand by evidence?
|
|
2. What benefits would you hope to receive by using evidence?
|
|
3. In what ways has the use of evidence met your expectations?
|
|
4. In what ways has using evidence failed to meet your expectations?
|
|
Perceived outcomes of using local evidence in the planning process
|
1. Have you been using local evidence to meet your specific needs?
|
|
2. Have you been using local evidence to meet your specific needs in the planning process?
|
|
3. Do you think that the use of local evidence has benefited you and the district? If yes:
|
|
4. In what way has the use of local evidence benefited you, the planning process and the district?
|
|
5. Do you think that the use of local evidence will (or has already) had an impact on the district health system and the planning process?
|
|
6. In your opinion, what has been the most important outcome of using local evidence in the planning process?
|
|
How the use of locally generated data has affected the planning process and resource allocation for child survival activities
|
1. To what extent has the use of local evidence affected your role in the planning process?
|
|
2. Were any activities that were not previously identified as priorities included in the annual work plan?
|
|
3. Has the use of local evidence affected your authority in the planning process?
|
|
4. Have you had any professional or political concerns regarding the use of local evidence OR have there been? If yes, elaborate.
|
|
5. Has the use of evidence affected the nature and range of resources allocation decisions made in the district?
|
|
6. How much freedom do you or other local managers have to reallocate funds between line items and programmes?
|
